World Library  

QR link for Empirical Analysis of Japanese Flood Risk Acceptability Within Multi-risk Context : Volume 8, Issue 5 (14/10/2008)
Add to Book Shelf
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Book

Empirical Analysis of Japanese Flood Risk Acceptability Within Multi-risk Context : Volume 8, Issue 5 (14/10/2008)

By Zhai, G.

Click here to view

Book Id: WPLBN0003992323
Format Type: PDF Article :
File Size: Pages 18
Reproduction Date: 2015

Title: Empirical Analysis of Japanese Flood Risk Acceptability Within Multi-risk Context : Volume 8, Issue 5 (14/10/2008)  
Author: Zhai, G.
Volume: Vol. 8, Issue 5
Language: English
Subject: Science, Natural, Hazards
Collections: Periodicals: Journal and Magazine Collection, Copernicus GmbH
Publication Date:
Publisher: Copernicus Gmbh, Göttingen, Germany
Member Page: Copernicus Publications


APA MLA Chicago

Ikeda, S., & Zhai, G. (2008). Empirical Analysis of Japanese Flood Risk Acceptability Within Multi-risk Context : Volume 8, Issue 5 (14/10/2008). Retrieved from

Description: Laboratory for Urban Disaster and Public Safety, Nanjing University, 22 Hankou Road, Nanjing, 210093, China. This paper establishes a framework of a multi-risk context for analyzing acceptable risk beyond single-risk context and empirically examines how other risks affects flood risk acceptability based on Rational Action Paradigm (RAP) by using a survey conducted in the Toki-Shonai River region of Japan. The main findings obtained by cross-sectional analysis and covariance structure analysis within a multi-risk context can be summarized as follows.

– Nearly half of the respondents accept no flood risk at all.

– Flood risk acceptability depends on not only on the factors of flood risk itself (e.g. frequency, consequence, and characteristics), but also other types of risks involved in our technological society.

– Flood risk acceptability is associated with a multi-risk context. Whether a risk is accepted depends on its perceived importance relative to others as well as the balance of its cost and benefit. Providing budget information and ensuring preparedness for flood risk may also affect the acceptability.

Empirical analysis of Japanese flood risk acceptability within multi-risk context

Covello, V. T., Slovic, P., and von Winterfeldt D.: Disaster and Crisis Communications, Findings and Implications for Research and Polciy, in: Risk Communication, edited by: Jungermann, H., Kasperson, R. E., and Wiedemann, P. M., Research Center Julich, 1998.; Datascape and Communications Inc.: Kurofune 2004 for Windows, 2004.; EPA (Environmental Protection Agency): National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, 53 Fed. Reg. 28 495, 1988.; Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., and Combs, B.: How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits., Policy Science, 9, 127–152, 1978.; Fischhoff, B.: Acceptable Risk: A Conceptual Proposal, RISK: Health, Safety and Environment, 5.1, 1–28, 1994.; Hidano, N. and Kato, T.: A comparison of tax and donation formats in contingent valuation surveys: The case of Japan, Discussion Paper No.00-1, available at www: (in Japanese with English abstract), accessed on 19~May~2005, 2000.; Jeager, C. C, Renn, O., Rosa, E. A., and Webler T.: Risk, Uncertainty, and Rational Action, Earthscan Publications Ltd, London and Sterling, VA, 2001.; Japan Consumer Marketing Research Institute: Risk aversion orientation, available at, accessed on 9~December~2004, 2002.; Joffe, H.: Risk and the other, Cambrige: Cambrige University Press, 1999.; Katada Lab: Report on the 2004 Niigata-Fukushima Flood, at, accessed on 16~January~2005, 2004, (in Japanese).; Krzanowsk, W. J. I and Marriott, F. H.: Multivariate Analysis: Classification, Covariance Structures and Repeated Measurements, Oxford University Press, 1998.; Lave, L. B. and Byrd, D. M.: How much Risk Is Acceptable? Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 42, 93–95, 1989.; Motoyoshi, T., Takao, K., and Ikeda S.: Determinant factors of residents' acceptance of flood risk, Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 20(1), 58–67, 2004, (in Japanese).; Nakayachi, K.: Do people actually pursue risk elimination in environmental risk management? Risk Analysis, 20, 705–711, 2000.; Nigg, J. M.: Risk Communication and Warning Systems, 369–382 in: Natural Risk and Civil Protection, edited by: Horlick-Jones, T., Amendola, A., and Casale, R., London: Chapman and Hall, 1995.; Pasman, H. J.: Risk Perception and the Acceptable Risk-influence Factors. 2nd World Congress on Safety Science, Budapest 21–24~November, 1993.; Perry, R. W., Greene, M. R., and Lindell, M. K.: Enhancing Evacuation Warning Compliance: Suggestions for Emergency Planning., Disasters, 4, 433–449, 1980.; Philley, J. O.: Acceptable Risk – An Overview, Plant/Operations Progress, 11(4), 218–223, 1992.; Pilgrim, N. K.: Landslides, Risk and Decision-Making in Kinnaur District: Bridging the Gap between Science and Public Opinion, Disaster, 23(1), 45–65, 1999.; Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S.: Rating the risks, Environment, 21(3), 14–20, 36–39, 1979.; Slovic, P. and Monahan, J.: Probability, Danger and Coercion: A Study of Risk Perception and Decision-Making in Mental Health Law, Law and Human Behaviour, 19(1), 49–65, 1995.; SPSS Inc.: SPSS 10.0J for Windows, SPSS Inc., 1999a (in Japanese).; SPSS Inc.: A mos 4.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., 1999b (in Japanese).; Starr, C.: Social benefit versus technological risk, Science, 165, 1232–1238, 1969.; Statistical Bureau: Japanese census of housing and land, available at (in Japanese), accessed on 10~December~2004, 1998.; Statistical Bureau: National Census, available at (in Japanese), accessed on 10~December~2005, 2000.; Statistical Bureau: Japanese Population Census, available at (in Japanese), accessed on 10~December~2005, 2005.; Travis, C. C., Crouch, E., Wilson, R., Kl


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.